1168षट्‏त्रिंशद् भूषणादीनि सामादीन्येकर्विंशतिः ।
लक्ष्म संध्यन्तराख्यानि सालंकारेषु तेषु च ॥ ८५ ॥

विभूषणं चाक्षरसंहतिश्च शोभाभिमानो गुणकीर्तनं च इत्येवमादीनि षट्‏त्रिंशत् काव्यलक्षणानि, साम भेदः प्रदानं च इत्येवमादीनि संध्यन्तराण्ये- कविंशतिरुपमादिऽवलंकारेषु1169 हर्षोत्साहादिष्वन्तर्भवन्ति1170 । तेन न पृथगुक्तानि ।

षट्‏त्रिंशदिति । ‘भूषणाक्षरसंघातः शोभोदाहरणे तथा’ 11711172 इत्यादिभिः कीर्तितानि षट्‏त्रिंशद् भूषणादीनि, एकविंशतिः सामप्रभृतीनि संध्यन्तराणि, 1173उपमादयोऽलंकाराश्च तेषु तेषु हर्षोत्साहादिष्वन्तर्भूतत्वात् पृथङ् न कीर्तितानीत्यर्थः ।

  1. Bahurūpamiśra does not seem to mention or comment upon (I do not find in the copies with me) the kārikā ṣaṭtriṃśad bhūṣaṇādini, etc. A.T.A. has the kārikā.

  2. See Note 281 to Laghuṭīkā.

  3. N.S.P. antarbhāvān na pṛthag uktāni. See Note 280 and 281 to Laghuṭīkā.

  4. Of the 16th chapter of the Nāṭyaśāstra there seem to have been two different recensions. One was followed by Abhinava and commented on, and the other by some others. What Dhanika quotes as: vibhūṣaṇaṃ cākṣarasaṃhatiś ca śobhābhimānau guṇakīrtanaṃ ca is the one found in the beginning of the 16th chapter and commented on by Abhinava too. Bh.Nṛ. however cites the verse bhūṣaṇākṣarasaṃghātaḥ, etc. which is found in the beginning of the ṣoḍaśādhyāyānubandha (both are printed in G.O.S.). Perhaps Bh.Nṛ. followed the recension other that the one followed by Dhanika. Or perhaps the text of the Avaloka as available now is not authentic. Bh.Nṛ. does not have any discussion about it.

  5. (ना॰ शा॰ १६ अनुबन्धः)
  6. upapāditeṣv alaṃkāreṣu ca harṣotsāhādiṣv antarbhavanti. tena na pṛthag uktāni is the reading of the Avaloka here according to A.T.A. N.S.P. reads upamādiṣv ivālaṃkāreṣu harṣotsāhādiṣv antarbhāvānna pṛthag uktāni. Bh.Nṛ.’s comments here run as upamādayo ’laṃkārāś ca teṣu teṣu harṣotsāhādiṣv antarbhūtatvāt pṛthaṅ na kīrtitānīty arthaḥ. The exact significance here intended by Dhanaṃjaya, Dhanika and Bh.Nṛ, is not very clear to me.